Difference Between AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud Comparison
AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud storage has created a revolution in the IT industry. Professionals and entrepreneurs are shifting their businesses to cloud storage. Which is expected given the benefits of cloud technology.
Public cloud services are typically used as follows:
- IaaS ( Infrastructure as a Service )
- PaaS ( Platform as a Service )
- SaaS ( Software as a Service )
According to a Gartner Survey report, it is estimated that the public cloud technology market will reach a total value of $411 billion by 2020. Cloud technology is used for backups, data storage, collaborative work, and more.
Currently, AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud is the largest in the world of cloud technology. Which is better? Well, there is no definitive answer.
Here’s a comparison of these three big services to help you decide which one is right for you.
AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud Computing Services
Any large cloud service provider should provide the ability to scale thousands of nodes in just a few minutes. Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) is used to provide users with computing services to configure a virtual machine (VM) using either custom or pre-made Amazon Machine Images (AMIs).
Other than the total number of virtual machines, their capacity, memory capacity, and size, users can also choose from the different available regions and destinations. In addition, EC2 provides support for auto-scaling and ELB (load balancing) features.
The former allows loads to be distributed across instances, while the latter enables automatic expansion of the virtual machine (VM) capacity. While Azure offers a Virtual Hard Disk (VHD) for virtual machine setup, Google provides GCE (Google Compute Engine) to do the same.
The virtual hard disk (VHD) can be pre-selected, by Microsoft, third parties, or by the user. For each Microsoft Azure virtual machine, users also need to specify the number of cores and the amount of memory required.
Similar to AWS, Google allows users to choose between available regions. Launched in 2013, GCE provides many features, such as faster hard disks, load balancing, support for multiple operating systems, support for live migration, and additional cores.
AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud Database
AWS offers ephemeral storage. They are assigned a place once an instance is started, and erased when the copy is terminated. AWS offers Block Storage, which is the equivalent of hard disks and, as such, can be attached to any instance, or used separately.
For object storage, AWS offers S3, and Glacier provides archiving services. It also supports non-relational databases (NoSQL), relational databases, and big data.
Microsoft Azure relies on drive D, and Page Blobs for VM-based volumes. While the first option is the cache option, the last option is the block storage option from Microsoft.
With Windows Azure Table and HDInsight, Microsoft Azure supports relational and non-relational (NoSQL) databases, as well as big data.
The Google Cloud platform also provides caching, as well as persistent storage on disk. Google Cloud Storage is used for Object Storage.
Google Cloud supports relational databases via Google Cloud SQL, provides inexpensive archiving, and no delays when retrieving via Google Cloud Nearline. Normalized databases are used by the Big Three in public cloud computing.
AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud Development tools
In addition to providing cloud services, cloud service providers also meet the requirements for development tools. These tools help build, debug, deploy, verify, and manage cross-platform applications and services that serve as cloud services.
Google Cloud offers Cloud Test Lab and Cloud Source Repositories for application testing and Git repositories respectively. It does not support the DevOps ecosystem, developer tools, and media transcoding that Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure provide.
AWS provides Elastic Transcoder, Device Farm, and CodeBuild features for Media Transcoding , application testing, and DevOps work, respectively. Microsoft Azure offers Media Service for media transcoding, DevTest Labs for application testing, and Visual Studio Team services for DevOps technology.
AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud Management and monitoring
Management and monitoring are important aspects of cloud computing. The three cloud service providers provide a wide range of monitoring and management services.
In the management area, AWS provides three options:
- Application Discovery Service
- Personal Health Dashboard
- System Manager
- Microsoft Azure offers four management options:
- Log Analytics
- Operations Management Suite
- Resource Health
AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud Storage Explorer
Google provides Cloud Console for Administration. Each of the three cloud service providers offer a billing API. Cloudwatch, Management Console, and X-Ray are all available in the Cloud Advisor feature provided by AWS. Azure offers Application Insights, Monitor, and Portal features for the same purpose.
Cloud Advisor provides features CloudShell, Debugger, Error Code, Stackdriver Monitoring, and Trace.
AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud Market Share
Amazon Web Services alone accounts for 62% of the total cloud market. While Microsoft Azure accounts for 20%, and Google Cloud 12%.
Only 6% of the market share goes to other providers, which makes Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud the largest cloud service providers in the world.
Twitters Like / Favorites 1000 Increase SMM Panel Cheap Price
AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud Networking and content delivery
Cloud service providers rely on different types of virtual networks. While Amazon Web Services relies on the Virtual Private Cloud network, Microsoft Azure relies on the Virtual Network. Google Cloud uses a Subnet network.
In order to enable end users to aggregate virtual machines into isolated networks in the cloud, Amazon and Azure respectively use Virtual Private Clouds (VPCs) and Virtual Networks (VNET).
These technologies allow the creation of subnets and the definition of network topologies, as well as the creation and definition of routing tables and network gateways. AWS provides Route 53, a DNS service.
To scale your on-premises data center into a public or hybrid cloud, AWS and Azure offer a number of solutions.
Each instance of Google Compute Engine belongs to a single network. The address range and gateway address depend on the selected network. It is possible to allow firewall rules for a specific instance and give it a public IP address.
AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud Pricing
In order to meet the demands of users, cloud service leaders offer a simple pricing system. Each of the three cloud service providers offers its own pricing model. You don’t have to buy the cloud solution, but you pay as you go.
How much you have to pay your cloud service provider depends on how many services you use. In Amazon Web Services, the amount is calculated based on the total number of hours used.
There are three types of pricing models that AWS offers:
- On-demand – no upfront cost, pay for what you use
- Reserved – Reserve instances for 1 or 3 years at an upfront cost based on usage type
- Spot – Customers pay for the extra capacity available
While the minimum charge time for AWS users is 1 hour, it is 10 minutes for Google Cloud users. Unlike AWS, Google Cloud offers a flexible payment plan if you book.
Microsoft Azure charges its users based on the total minutes consumed. They also provide short-term commitments, in addition to discounts.
AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud Security
Security is a top priority for all three big players in public cloud computing services. AWS and Microsoft Azure both rely on Fortinet to provide powerful security features. However, there are some differences in the way they use this technology.
Fortinet on AWS provides Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) security measures in many regions on a demand basis. In the case of Microsoft Azure, Fortinet provides enhanced data and application security while removing the additional security overhead required during migration.
Google Cloud relies on the FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall for advanced protection, as well as for use as a firewall.
AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud Storage
Amazon Web Services provides long-term storage services. The storage services provided by Microsoft Azure as well as Google Cloud are reliable and robust.
For Object Storage Services, AWS provides S3, Azure provides Block Blob Storage, and Google provides Cloud Storage. AWS supports 3 types of archive storage, Data Archive, Glacier, and S3 Infrequent Access.
Azure and Google both offer two types of archive storage; Cool and Archive for Azure, and Nearline and Coldine for Google. For Hybrid Storage, AWS offers Storage Gateway, Azure offers StorSimple, and Google Cloud offers Egnyte Sync.
Conclusion
It is very difficult for any other cloud service provider to challenge any of these big three i.e. AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud. Each of them is a great choice to use as the foundation for your enterprise cloud services.
The final choice of the cloud service provider is based on the user’s preferences and requirements. Other than that, all three providers are roughly equal in all respects.
https://4ouryou.com/product/get-tiktok-profile-followers-1000-increase-real-user-traffic/